On Thu, October 30, 2014 6:54 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/29/2014 11:01 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:56:58AM +0000, Always Learning wrote: >>> >>> iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT >>> >>> No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another user defined >>> table name. >>> >>> firewall-cmd with its Windoze-like structure and syntax is definitely >>> unappealing to many normal firewall users. >> >> If this is done on a box with firewalld enabled it will be overwritten >> as firewalld knows nothing about it. > > You can turn off firewalld and use iptables if that is the desire. That > is what I have done on my test machines. At the moment this can be a solution. But one day this option will be gone, so at your leisure try to accommodate to new reality... whatever you think about it. Valeri > > Some of us old farts don't do well with change :D > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++