On 2014-09-07 2:56 pm, Oliver Schad wrote: > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700 > John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > >> On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote: >> > And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM >> >> https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for >> x86_64. > > It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about > ressources, even in a linux distro with long term support and > enterprise features. > > Enterprise doesn't mean waste your money. And really, to double the > memory to install a machine - are you kidding me? They've never thought > about it and I really hate this attitude. > > Best Regards > Oli Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the CentOS packagers, you might wish to vent at the Upstream...because, when all is said and done, CentOS is a repackaged RHEL. Whatever the requirements are for the upstream are the requirements for CentOS. Whatever the installer looks for in RHEL is going to be the same thing that the installer looks for in CentOS. I will leave you with this minor piece of wisdome, which I've seen repeated in this list many times: if you don't agree with the requirements or feel that there's a bug in the installer, you are more than welcome to file a bug report with the upstream. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org "It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever just stops by to say 'hi' anymore." --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1