On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Mon, September 15, 2014 4:49 pm, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> The SSD and second CPU core are not free. >> >> Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC > > Is it Salt Lake City that you are from? (that is so reach with > Second Level Cache... That is what you actually meant I figure) > > Am I the only one who is tempted to say: people, could you kindly > start deciphering your abbreviations. I know, I know, computed > science uses _that_ abbreviation for years. But we definitely have > people without computer science degree (not me, I do have one ;-) on > the list who will be happier to learn terms and abbreviations if it > is mentioned what stands for what. In defense of the OP ("original poster"), he mentioned "SLC" in 1. a throw-away line meant as a joke, 2. the clear context of SSD ("solid-state drive(s)"), where the distinction between MLC ("multi-level cell") and SLC ("single-level cell") technology has been widely discussed. In this case, I'd give more weight to point number 1: I'd estimate that 493 out of 500 readers of this list would have immediately grasped he was making a joke. Even if they didn't get the SLC reference, they understood that jokes can be safely ignored without missing any important bits of the discussion. In the case of point #2, I'd say that abuse is definitely in the eye of the beholder. Who is the arbiter of when an acronym is obvious or obscure? I mean that as a serious question. Who gets to say that USB is an acceptable acronym while SLC is not? If you know, how does one become that person? -- Paul Heinlein heinlein at madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W