Jeff Boyce wrote:
> Sorry for breaking the threading, as I only get the daily digest. My
> comments (interspersed) begin with the **.
>
>
> Message: 41
<snip>
> in the first link of the group of references posted at the bottom of your
> note. I was a little put off by the article having fairly significant
> warnings in the first two paragraphs of the article, so I only skimmed
> through it.
>
>> CentOS 5 with raid 1, but there is a big warning about being an
>> unsupported (risky) approach. Can anyone point me to a good how-to, or
>> provide some general guidance. Thanks.
<MVNCH>
I've got servers here that I did in CentOS 5 - certainly, it was either
'09 or '10, and never had a problem. I'm very happy with Linux mdadm RAID
1.
mark