On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:11 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Mon, September 29, 2014 12:59 pm, Chris Beattie wrote: > > > Nothing in this message is intended to make or accept an offer or to form > > a contract, except that an attachment that is an image of a contract > > bearing the signature of an officer of our company may be or become a > > contract. This message (including any attachments) is intended only for > > the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. It may > > contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, > > confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may > > constitute as attorney work product. If you are not the intended > > recipient, we hereby notify you that any use, dissemination, distribution, > > or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received > > this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and > > delete this message immediately. > > > > Thank you. > > I was about to answer the question then all of a sudden my eye caught this > footer which offended me, so I decided mention this fact instead of > answering question... > > Valeri > > PS I never feel obliged to anything that is sent to me in e-mail without > me originally soliciting it. All obligations lie purely on the sender. > This has always be that way and will always be no matter whether I read > your crap or not (sorry, everybody who does not send e-mail with that > crap, it is really difficult to hold one's feelings when you just got > offended). That signature is time-wasting meaningless waffle (or gibberish, if one prefers). It has no legal worth despite the 'efforts' of the untrained legal expert who composed it :-) Regards, Paul. England, EU.