[CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue
Keith Keller
kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.usWed Sep 3 05:22:09 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bare drive RAID question, was RE: *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]
- Next message: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2014-09-02, m.roth at 5-cent.us <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > And my manager has taken a fancy to raw drives; not sure why. Some reasons have already been cited in this thread. No reasons are given, but the author of md and mdadm apparently prefers raw drives too. https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Partition_Types I think the take-home message from that document is: "There is no right answer - you can choose." --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bare drive RAID question, was RE: *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]
- Next message: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list