[CentOS] LS command bizzare behavior

Mon Sep 22 18:11:36 UTC 2014
Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>

On 2014-09-22, Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:48:32 -0500
> Dan Hyatt wrote:
>> but we can vi the files, we can access them via other means if we know 
>> the name. Then once we have accessed them, LS now shows the files.
> Sounds like a caching issue to me.  After you have accessed the file, it's in the cache and you can see it.

More specifically, it sounds like a client-side caching issue.  I've
seen this happen on linux clients if I'm *really* fast on the trigger.


kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us