On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/01/2015 11:45 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote: >>> This was discussed on the CentOS-Devel mailing list and approved by the >>> CentOS Board. It is what we are using in the future. I suggest you >>> become familiar with it. >> >> Obviously naming conventions should provide for an easy upstream vendor >> version reference? > > does /etc/centos-release-upstream provide you with that ? /etc/centos-release-upstream is not useful when looking at an iso name. With 7.0 the iso name was CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso. With 7.1 the iso name is CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503-01.iso. Since you dropped the minor version in the iso name and assuming that you are not going to put it back in the future, going forward I will need a chart to figure out what upstream version an iso corresponds to. How is that better? Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me123 at tdiehl.org