On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway at gmail.com> wrote: > In the context of this discussion I would appreciate any feedback the list > might have on this article I wrote for my new company. > > http://otternetworks.de/tech/rhel-centos-brief/ Well put. For a non-technical person, your brief clues them in to the differences between RHEL and CentOS. And the reason both coexist. I do however agree with Valeri in that you probably (c|s)hould mention Debian in there somewhere. I realize you left Debian out because there is no official "enterprise" support entity as there is with Ubuntu. So at that point, maybe it's not worth mentioning Debian? > > > I for one welcome our Redhat overlords. I think they will provide better > governance which should give Centos better credibility as an Enterprise, > community supported operating system. > > On 4 April 2015 at 17:17, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > > On 04/04/2015 06:12 AM, Nux! wrote: > > > >> 100% with Digimer here. > >> > >> I think there are no conspiracy theories. IMO RedHat does not want nor > >> does it afford to mess up CentOS. > >> > >> All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the project, > >> testing, helping out community. > >> > >> Lucian > >> > >> > >> Agreed, and I want to thank you specifically for the nux dextop repo, > > which is in my standard installed repo set for EL6 and EL7. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //