On 4/20/2015 9:08 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > The second idea was to set each filesystem to a different random count > value. This would run the risk of having two or more executions at > the same time but it would probably not be very frequent. > > Does anyone have a suggestion for a better way of doing this? use XFS, no fsck's until/unless something catastrophic happens to the file system. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz