On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > And the problem is the GPL. I recommend you to work on making all GPL code > freely combinable with other OSS. Of course the problem it the GPL. Glad you recognize that. It's whole point is the restriction against linking with anything with an incompatible license which obviously prevents a lot of best-of-breed combinations. > My code is fully legal and there is absolutely no license problem with it. Umm, no. Larry Wall clearly understood this eons ago. > Just do not follow the false claims from some OSS enemies...and believe the > lawyers that checked my code ;-) > > My code was audited by "Sun legal", "Oracle legal" and by the legal department > from SuSe. Sure, there is nothing 'wrong' with your licence as long as it isn't mixed with anything with different restrictions. Just don't act surprised that the code doesn't get used in projects that have to accommodate GPL restrictions. > Question: when will RedHat follow the legal audits from these companies? Question: If _you_ believe that it is OK to mix your code with GPL'd code, why not add the dual licensing statement that would make it clear for everyone else? It doesn't take anything away - unless you really don't want it to be used in other projects. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com