[CentOS] Fail2Ban Centos 7 is there a trick to making it work?
Andrea Dell'Amico
adellam-lists at sevenseas.orgSun Apr 5 14:54:34 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] perf trace
- Next message: [CentOS] Selinux issues with 7.1 update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 13:35, John Horne <john.horne at plymouth.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:43 +0100, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: >> >> #============= logrotate_t ============== >> allow logrotate_t fail2ban_client_exec_t:file { ioctl read execute >> execute_no_trans open }; >> > Looks like this was already fixed in 'selinux-policy'. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114821 Thanks. I didn’t notice that bug, and the changelog didn’t report anything about fail2ban. > John. Ciao, andrea -- Andrea Dell'Amico http://adellam.sevenseas.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 841 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150405/c8a1c1c8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] perf trace
- Next message: [CentOS] Selinux issues with 7.1 update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list