[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Joerg Schilling
Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Fri Apr 24 13:37:38 UTC 2015
Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote:
> > AFAIR, ksh was OSS (but not using an OSI approved license) since 1997. Since
>
> In 1998 each user had to sign a license; you couldn't give away copies
> to other people.
>
> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:09:30 -0400 (EDT)
> From: David Korn <dgk at research.att.com>
>
> If you are going to make copies for use at your course there is
> no problem. However, if users are to get their own copies
> to take home with them, then we need to get each of them
> to accpet the license agreement that is on the web.
OK, I remeber again: You had to click "accept" on the web to get your copy of
the source. This need was removed in 2001.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
More information about the CentOS
mailing list