[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Jack Bailey
jack at internetguy.net
Fri Apr 24 20:04:35 UTC 2015
On 04/24/15 05:59, Les Mikesell wrote:
> The original ksh wasn't open source and might even have been an
> extra-cost item in AT&T unix. And the early emulations weren't
> always complete so you couldn't count on script portability. I
> generally thought it was safer to use perl for anything that took more
> than bourne shell syntax.
You're right about the extra cost. In 1989 I bought the ksh source code
from AT&T for $100.
Jack
More information about the CentOS
mailing list