[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Joerg Schilling
Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Mon Apr 27 21:19:43 UTC 2015
Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
> <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause'
> >> license, or BSD-old:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
> >
> > Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
>
> The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a
> dual license to make your code as usable and probably as ubiquitous as
> perl. And you have not mentioned anything about how that might hurt
> you.
I explained this to you in vast details. If you ignore this explanation, I
cannot help you.
Jörg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
More information about the CentOS
mailing list