[CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
Jonathan Billings
billings at negate.orgThu Apr 9 12:49:03 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:50:41PM +0100, lhecking at users.sourceforge.net wrote: > While only vaguely related to this topic, does anyone else find that > CentOS6 desktop stability is lacking? Or did we just never notice because > no monitoring was in place pre-C6? > > I'm refering to abrtd which is sending out a susprising amount of notifications > about crashing desktop components like nautilus gthumb gnome-panel gvfsd-trash > gvfsd-metadata gnome-settings-daemon, to name just a few. I don't see this in our ~1000 RHEL6.6 student workstations we run. Assuming the desktop packages are bug-identical in CentOS, I'd assume to see the same amount of errors. I suspect you might want to investigate the abrt errors to see if there isn't something amiss in your environment. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Next message: [CentOS] Problems with getty and X on runlevel switch [Was: Re: The future of centos]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list