[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Joerg Schilling
Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.deMon Apr 27 09:36:37 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > oh fun, just did some tests (using c6.latest). if you're in bash, > ./script (sans shebang) runs it in bash. if you're in dash or csh, > ./script runs it in sh. if you're in ksh, it runs it in ksh. See my other mail. The scripts (unless marked) are run by the current interpreter. Csh runs unmarked scripts by "sh". Jörg -- EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
- Previous message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list