[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> 
> This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been 
> added with Svr4:

Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell?

  http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh.html

I see that you already wrote up the differences between osh and bosh in an earlier post.  Is there a good reason why these comparisons are not on the Schily Tools web page already? :)