[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Apr 27 16:52:28 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > >>> 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. >> >> The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS enemies. > > The following irritates me, I am a “people,” and I am not an OSS enemy: > > http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue It is really the GPL that has the restriction preventing 'best-of-breed' components being combined, but it doesn't matter, it isn't going to change. I can see Sun being irritated with Linux (and for good reason...) but isn't it time to let it go? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list