[CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
Always Learning
centos at u64.u22.netMon Apr 27 19:26:39 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Can we take the license wanking off the list please? I don't think > either of the people arguing are actually lawyers, so it has no > relevance. Relevance is not dependent on being, or not being, a lawyer. Relevance for inclusion on the mailing list is a close connection to Centos/RHEL :-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Je suis Charlie.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Next message: [CentOS] Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list