On 12/03/2015 04:24 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > ... ton of work that we have to do for each new release, and we have > depended in the past on the versions matching the RHEL ones. Now, they > don't, and that's wrong. I would respectfully disagree here, in that my opinion is that relying on any distribution minor version number in the first place is what is wrong. (And I think that regardless of which distribution we're talking about....) I honestly wish Red Hat would have stuck to the 'XupdateY' format that they started with, as that is more correct. The update rollup number is not a minor version number in the strict sense of the word, at least IMO. Heh, I am waiting to see if the differences between RHEL 7.2 and RHEL 7.3 will be as large as the differences were between RHL 7.2 and RHL 7.3 back in the day......