On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 07/12/15 15:52, John Hodrien wrote: > > > To me, I'm not sure I get any issues or advantages from the new scheme, > > but I > > can't say it bothers me greatly. > > This is the thing that bothers me most - that folks dont have a good > grasp on what / why the numbering is working like this. > > We are still a small team, and all efforts are flat out on getting the > iso media and images done, out of the door - but as soon as I have this > done, I'll look at hosting some google hangouts, irc sessions and maybe > a longer email thread as well to lay out the numbering proposition. > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large enterprise environment. It is usually blocked. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu