On 12/09/2015 09:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is >> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora >> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or >> hundreds of contributors introduces something that in my opinion may >> impact a server installation. .... >> >> Am I correct? > Yeah, pretty much. At least you have the ability to have some input > upstream, unlike with Windows. > > Once it is in RHEL, it is simply *going* to be in CentOS, full stop. If > you don't want it in CentOS, then it needs to be yelled about when it > appears in Fedora. Yes, this is work. But many are already doing this > work; it is those people whose voices are being heard; it is also some > of those people that are making dynamic networking happen (which is > useful for more than just laptops). Hi, I think saying that you can have some say as to what goes into Fedora is being a little naive, look at systemd, many people complained about its inclusion but the powers to be heard none of it, and the refrain I saw was if you don't like systemd then run something else. Regards, Steve > > If you want your voice to be heard, you have to use your voice in the > venue where changes can happen. Once it is in a particular major > version of CentOS, it is simply not going away (unless RHEL removes it). > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com