Hello, i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default routes solve my problem perfect. Thank you all. J Am 2015-12-30 17:21, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru: > On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote: >> >> On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >>> "I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default >>> gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the >>> incoming device " >> >> I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and >> everything that Gordon (and I mentioned in my first post) is accurate. >> This is a routing problem not a NATing problem. Even if it can be >> handled via NATing (which I serious doubt) it would require ridiculous >> server resources which are not necessary. Please look at our links >> carefully, This problem is simply handled by proper routing rules. >> Whether those are implemented via my suggested generic linux rules or >> via the Redhat specific rules Gordon suggested that is the proper way >> to >> handle the problem. I too am puzzled by what you are trying to do here >> otherwise. >> >> And just for the record I have a server with two interfaces on the >> same >> broadcast network and did exactly what I showed in the link I sent and >> got exactly what I wanted. From this single sentence you seem to want >> to >> do what either Gordon or I suggested in the links we sent. Why do you >> insist on playing with iptables when that is not the proper tool for >> this job? > > I do not insist on anything else then there are missing things in the > picture... it is that simple nothing more then that. > If the thread poster will bother to clear the picture then I will be > able to understand. > I do not want anything and I do not need anything for me, my servers > and routing works just great but the thread started by someone which > is not here anymore so if everything works for me and if everything > works for you and Gordon I really do not think any more time or words > should be invested in something that is unclear at-least to me. > > Eliezer > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos