Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >> Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: >>>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >>>> >>>> CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ... >>> >>> aka 7.2, huh? auka 7.2 would be more appropriate IMHO (by auka meaning >>> Also UnKnown As). Seriously, the scheme is awfully obscure. Our >>> proficiemcy becomes aking the one of MS Windows admins: you just need >>> to learn new names or locations of yet the same tools. >>> >>> Sorry, I forgot to pus sarcasm tags... >>> >> Agreed. I don't want "hints", and I'm not doing fedora or ubuntu, >> because I don't want the LATESTGREATESTBLEEDINGEDGETIP, I want >> *stability*, and, since we're supposed to be *enterprise* grade, >> I want stuff that's simple enough for a poor ol' sysadmin, who >> might have to explain to a manager what we're on.... > > well - for CentOS there is only one state where you should be - on the > "latest". Sorry, you seem to not have dealt with enough managers who only really know Windows, or other divisions (esp. ones that are 95% Windows) who require documentation, etc.... I can live with the x.y.yymm, but not showing the relation to upstream is annoying. mark