Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example, >> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE* o/s... why does it >> > automatically, without ever asking, install anything wifi? I'm > [...] >> The short answer: Because RHEL is based on Fedora development. > > This is roughly true, although "downstream" RHEL makes its own > decisions about many things. If you (Mark, or anyone else) would like > to make this different in the future, getting involved with Fedora > Server is a good way to do so. Oh, one more thing: as I posted (by request) on Bruce Schneir's blog last week, one thing that has *always* really annoyed me is when architects or developers DON'T TALK TO END USERS, but some manager who *knows* what needs to happen designs the whole thing. Too many times I've seen the end result: end users, the mass of folks who have to use it, range from dislike to loathing, and avoid using something that *should* have made their life easier at work, instead making it *much* harder, until they have no choice. I've been pleased that the folks on this list have been solicited several times in the last six months for our opinions. mark