On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:48 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > >> I added these directives to the route-eth0:192 file: >> >> ADDRESS0=192.168.6.9 >> NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 >> GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 >> > > Which should have been: > > ADDRESS0=192.168.6.0 > > NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 > GATEWAY0=192.168.6.1 > But it still doesn't matter. Your netmask in the ifcfg- file already covers that range and you don't need another route/GATEWAY for it. You don't need the route- file at all. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com