[CentOS] Another Fedora decision
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Feb 5 02:23:52 UTC 2015
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote:
>
>>> Most such vulns are against Apache, PHP, etc, which do not run as root.
>>
>> Those are common. Combine them with anything called a 'local
>> privilege escalation' vulnerability and you've got a remote root
>> exploit.
>
> Not quite. An LPE can only be used against your system by logged-in users.
Or any running program - like a web server.
> To make a blended attack that can read /etc/shadow from an LPE, you need either SSH access or a remote shell vuln, not an arbitrary file read vuln. Holes that expose an unintended remote shell are quite a bit rarer than ones that allow a service like Apache to send you any file their non-root account has permission to read.
>
> It’s a bit like calling lightning to find a system where both types of vulnerabilities are available at the same time.
No, you exploit the server application hole to tell you about the
kernel vulnerability. The last one I saw in the wild involved the
symlink race in the kernel around centos 5.2 or .3 and a struts java
library bug. But there are people who know what combinations of
vulnerabilities to try.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list