[CentOS] Another Fedora decision
Always Learning
centos at u64.u22.net
Thu Feb 5 23:23:04 UTC 2015
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 16:39 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >>>
> >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1220 Jan 31 03:04 shadow
> Be it me, I would consider box compromised. All done on/from that box
> since probable day it happened compromised as well. If there is no way to
> establish the day, then since that system originally build. With full
> blown sweeping up the consequences. Finding really-really-really
> convincing proof it is not a result of compromise (and yes, fight one's
> wishful thinking!).
Logically ?
1. to change the permissions on shadow from -rw-x------ or from
---------- to -rw-r--r-- requires root permissions ?
2. if so, then what is the advantage of changing those permissions when
the entity possessing root authority can already read shadow - that
entity requires neither group nor user permissions to read shadow.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie.
More information about the CentOS
mailing list