[CentOS] [OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
Gordon Messmer
gordon.messmer at gmail.comWed Feb 11 17:51:25 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 02/11/2015 09:02 AM, Francis Gerund wrote: > When using rsync to backup and restore, when should and when should one > *not* include hard links (by using the -H option switch)? It's probably too site or application specific to give any general advice. Run this command across the filesystem you're going to back up: find /path -type f -links +1 All of the files listed in find's output have multiple links, and will benefit from using -H. The cost associated with -H is that rsync has to keep a table in memory of all of the inodes and paths that it processes. A large filesystem can cause rsync to consume a lot of RAM. If sufficient RAM is available, I would always recommend -H.
- Previous message: [CentOS] [OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
- Next message: [CentOS] [OT] Using rsync to backup / restore - when to use (or not use) the -H option switch?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list