El 10/01/2015 a las 11:41 p.m., John R Pierce escribió: > On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribió: >>> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >>>> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >>>> all IPv6s available for usage. >>> >>> Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats >>> 1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ? >>> >>> Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of 18,446,744,073,709,552,000 hosts each. >>> >>> >>> >> Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my >> work...). > > so what is it you want to do with these 1.2 septillion IP addresses? > you certainly can't assign them all to one system, there's not that > many file handles, nor can one system have anywheres remotely close to > that many vhosts. > > > Yup. It is actually just a way to figure out how to handle this with easy. But this will be use for a wide spread implementation.