On 01/18/2015 09:55 PM, Peter wrote: > On 01/19/2015 10:51 AM, Tim wrote: >> Just my two cents: Anyone thought of asking Red Hat to use >> documentation? I think they are getting much from the community so >> to copy public accessible documentation when permitted by RH could be >> an easy way. >> >> Why not giving that a try? > > There's no need to ask them, they've already given permission: > >> Copyright © 2014 Red Hat, Inc. >> This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons >> Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. If you distribute this >> document, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution >> to Red Hat, Inc. and provide a link to the original. If the document >> is modified, all Red Hat trademarks must be removed. > > I'd say that's good enough. It is good enough to take the Documentation and start taking out their trademarks, etc. And editing content too .. anything that is talking about RHN (for example) is NA. The bottom line is, if you want to use the Red Hat documentation it is is good as a reference, but it is not totally applicable. You know where to find it. But as CentOS is community supported, the community can (and should) take the documentation and turn it into CentOS specific versions. The CentOS project can facilitate an area in git that can be used for this and the centos-docs mailing list can be used as well. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150119/c326444f/attachment-0003.sig>