[CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux

Thu Jul 16 00:22:04 UTC 2015
Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>

On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote:
>  On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM  <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're
> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows
> binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly
> of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions?
> We use Bareos extensively. By default, Bareos is Bacula-compatible. We use
> Bareos extensively.

What is the story between bareos and bacula? And why you prefer bareos as
opposed to bacula. Just curios: I use bacula (it is bacula 5, server is
FreeBSD, clients are CentOS 5,6,7, FreeBSD 9,10, Windows 7). Thanks for
your insights!


Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247