On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > > All that matters for CentOS is: > > 1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS because of Red Hat's lawyers' interpretation > of GPL+CDDL > 2: Arguing about it here will not change #1 > 3: CentOS ships a clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and so won't have > things that Red Hat's lawyers don't approve (see #2) > > Please let it go. I think everybody here knows your opinion. +1 I for one will go with Btrfs. This is where the action is at, ATM, and more and more companies are investing in BTRFS and going with it: SUSE, Fujitsu, Docker, Facebook, Oracle... /// Btrfs 1.0, with finalized on-disk format, was originally slated for a late-2008 release,[12] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-12> and was finally accepted into the Linux kernel mainline <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_mainline> in 2009.[13] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-13> Several Linux distributions <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution> began offering Btrfs as an experimental choice of root file system <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_file_system> during installation.[14] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-14>[15] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-15>[16] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-16> In summer 2012, several Linux distributions moved Btrfs from experimental to production or supported status.[17] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-17>[18] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#cite_note-18> //// The ZFS Zealots (ZZ or Z-square) brigade act like kids on a temper trantum because they preferred toy was left out of the playground. Please get down your crying and yelling, there's people trying to work here (with btrfs). ;-p FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario - George Orwell