[CentOS] C5 : Firefox 38 bug

jd1008 jd1008 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 13 20:59:00 UTC 2015



On 06/13/2015 02:02 PM, g wrote:
>
> On 06/13/2015 01:05 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> <<<>>>
>
>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist
>> that is not viewable by the user.
>> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed
>> entries.
> and you know this how?
>
>
> i do not really believe there is a 'hidden whitelist'. it is more like
> there are sites that are used to check on sites you connect to. gaggle
> is one of them. :-P
>
> something you will/may find interesting, open about:config, enter
> "Search: whitelist" for info on noscript 'whitelist'. if you enter
> "Search: noscript", you will see that noscript stores one hell of a
> lot of info.
>
>
> see pages;
>
>    https://noscript.net/faq
>
>      then <ctrl-f> enter "find: whitelist", read all for more
>      whitelist info.
>
>    https://noscript.net/features#xss
>    https://noscript.net/faq#xss
>
>      then open noscript options select Advanced -> XSS, be sure both
>      selections are checked.
>
> you should also register here;
>
>    https://forums.informaction.com/viewforum.php?f=3
>
> to find out more about noscript and ask about 'hidden whitelist'.
>
>
> for further protection when surfing, get the 'wot' [web of trust]
> add-on;
>
>    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/
>
>    https://www.mywot.com/
>    https://www.mywot.com/en/settings/en-US/firefox/20131030/welcome
>
>    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOT_Services
Look, I am not trying to discourage anyone from using noscript.
I myself do use it. But I do not put my trust in it due to my prior
experience with it.
If you think it floats your boat, fine with me.
No need to beat on this any further.




More information about the CentOS mailing list