[CentOS] Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
Bill Maltby (C4B)
centos4bill at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 10:32:45 UTC 2015
On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 21:17 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> > Since the latest update (may wrap here),
> > xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> > 04:16:01 PM EDT
> > xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> > 04:15:58 PM EDT
> > <snip
> >
> > Xorg is competing heavily with FF for top hog on my system. In FF I
> > understand because I had multiple windows (6 desktops) with many tabs. I
> > know this would theoretically increase Xorg work as well but prior to
> > this update I seldom saw it near the top of "top"
> >
> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> > COMMAND
> > 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26
> > firefox
> > 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58
> > Xorg
> > 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51
> > java
> > 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69
> > plugin-containe
> > <snip>
> > Anyone else pound the crap out of a desktop with FF and see Xorg getting
> > "fat"?
> >
> > TIA for any clues or response.
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
> Here's what I see with three FF sessions running at the same time:
>
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>
> 2631 fahclien 39 19 832m 530m 3012 S 637.9 1.7 311:40.44 FahCore_a4
>
> 4236 mlapier 20 0 2530m 1.4g 42m R 83.7 4.6 2:50.27 firefox
>
> 2823 root 20 0 163m 42m 17m S 19.9 0.1 1:31.18 Xorg
>
> 3429 mlapier 20 0 625m 158m 39m S 2.3 0.5 1:06.08 skype
>
Thanks Mark.
Do you happen to know (recall?) if this is more or less in-line with
what went on before the latest Xorg fix?
I may not be doing too badly. I also run 3 users in three X sessions.
Two have six desktops and one has two desktops. The last is my "idle"
user, never doing anything, that sits on tty1 so I can have my active
users like they were before the CentOS 6.6 upgrade - the first X session
used to come on tty7 and did not screw up when switching run levels
to/from 3 and 5 (bug open on CentOS, but I suspect not passed
upstream?).
This is on my home-built box on an MSI 760GM-P23FX MB, SATA.
>From lspci -v, some things that may affect me?
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[AMD/ATI] Cedar [Radeon HD 5000/6000/7350/8350 Series] (prog-if 00 [VGA
controller])
Subsystem: Diamond Multimedia Systems Device 5450
Kernel driver in use: radeon
Kernel modules: radeon
CPU stuff, 6 cores:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 16
model : 10
model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1035T Processor
stepping : 0
cpu MHz : 800.000
cache size : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 6
core id : 0
cpu cores : 6
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 6
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext
fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good
nonstop_tsc extd_apicid aperfmperf pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm
cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch
osvw ibs skinit wdt nodeid_msr cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
pausefilter
bogomips : 5200.20
Memory: $ free (may wrap)
total used free shared buffers
cached
Mem: 8057968 2675424 5382544 12192 104652
1149796
-/+ buffers/cache: 1420976 6636992
Swap: 14352376 0 14352376
Do you/anyone think my Xorg CPU usage looks reasonable all things
considered or should I be looking for some "tweaks"?
TIA,
Bill
More information about the CentOS
mailing list