[CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comTue Jun 23 18:52:58 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
- Next message: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/23/2015 11:23 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > AIX does use lvm a lot. Main difference is their filesystem > allows live shrinking. Kinda nice to dynamically size a partition > depending on needs, as opposite to the so often suggested approach of > formatting the entire drive as one single partition. Symlinking is > great until whatever the destination is does not mount. I myself use > lvm as disks for my vm clients, which xenserver does too (not my fault > I promise!). It is faster than an image file. While it has the same concepts, physical volumes, volume groups, logical volumes, the LVM in AIX shares only the initials with Linux. I've heard that Linux's LVM was based on HP-UX's design. in AIX, the LVM is tightly integrated with file system management, so you issue the command to grow a file system, and it automatically grows the underlying logical volume. the OS itself can automatically grow file systems when its installing software. Also, in AIX, the volume manager is the raid manager, you say 'copies = 2' as an attribute of a LV, and data is mirrored. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
- Previous message: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
- Next message: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list