[CentOS] Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
Mark LaPierre
marklapier at gmail.comSun Jun 28 01:17:12 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
- Next message: [CentOS] Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
> Since the latest update (may wrap here),
> xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> 04:16:01 PM EDT
> xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015
> 04:15:58 PM EDT
> x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05
> PM EST
> xvidcore-1.2.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:55:49
> PM EST
> .
> .
> .
> drop a lot of older stable stuff ...
>
> Xorg is competing heavily with FF for top hog on my system. In FF I
> understand because I had multiple windows (6 desktops) with many tabs. I
> know this would theoretically increase Xorg work as well but prior to
> this update I seldom saw it near the top of "top"
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> COMMAND
> 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26
> firefox
> 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58
> Xorg
> 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51
> java
> 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69
> plugin-containe
> 27871 hardtolo 20 0 1957m 520m 88m S 7.6 6.6 456:54.44
> soffice.bin
> 18245 hardtolo 20 0 6228m 356m 26m S 7.3 4.5 112:09.55
> java
> 14349 hardtolo 20 0 6228m 345m 26m S 5.3 4.4 143:59.97
> java
> 9164 root 20 0 197m 51m 12m S 3.3 0.7 14:14.06
> Xorg
> 4152 hardtolo 20 0 915m 28m 20m S 1.7 0.4 182:27.00
> knotify4
> 27 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 1.0 0.0 28:58.96
> events/0
> 12581 wild-bil 20 0 302m 14m 9.9m S 1.0 0.2 0:02.43
> gnome-terminal
> 26741 hardtolo 20 0 15300 1420 892 S 1.0 0.0 0:02.47 top
>
> Anyone else pound the crap out of a desktop with FF and see Xorg getting
> "fat"?
>
> TIA for any clues or response.
>
> Bill
>
Here's what I see with three FF sessions running at the same time:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2631 fahclien 39 19 832m 530m 3012 S 637.9 1.7 311:40.44 FahCore_a4
4236 mlapier 20 0 2530m 1.4g 42m R 83.7 4.6 2:50.27 firefox
2823 root 20 0 163m 42m 17m S 19.9 0.1 1:31.18 Xorg
3429 mlapier 20 0 625m 158m 39m S 2.3 0.5 1:06.08 skype
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/
****
- Previous message: [CentOS] Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
- Next message: [CentOS] Anyone else think the latest Xorg fix is hogging stuff?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list