Care to explain those two. direct versus indirect mapping? On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> > wrote: > > Nope, that completely takes over '/mnt' and everything else that's in > there > > becomes invisible. However, I do believe you're on to something here. > > Looking back at the other, working setup, I do realize now that I did the > > same, where the path was '/mnt/<something>' and the autofs mounts are > > within that, so they became '/mnt/<something>/<mount-point>' - so thanks > > for that hint. I'll go fiddle with it. > > Right, I use something other than /mnt for my autofs. > > Another thing you may want to consider is use of 'direct map' instead > of 'indirect map'. If I remember correctly, it works well with cifs > mounts, too. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >