On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:43:27 -0500, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> >>> I found: >>> >>> http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/configuring-static-routes-in-debian-or-red-hat-linux-systems.html >>> >>> where it says to add to ifcfg-eth0: >>> >>> 192.168.128.0/17 via 40.53.24.3 > > That’s only for RHEL 7: http://goo.gl/AtjIyI Aside from being irritating, that's just wrong. I'm using that syntax on Centos5, >> ADDRESS0=192.168.128.0 >> NETMASK0=255.255.128.0 >> GATEWAY0=40.53.24.3 > > This is the scheme used in prior versions of RHEL. I think both types of syntax will work in all versions. The GUI tools do the latter form. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com