On 03/19/2015 07:47 PM, Mark Felder wrote: I just used the test script privided by RHEL https://access.redhat.com/labs/leapsecond/leap_vulnerability.sh to test my up2date CentOS 5 and CentOS 6 and all are reported as "Non Vulnerable" ! > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 18:30, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>>> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata* >>>> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the >>>> leap second have been fixed. >>> >>> https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145 >> In addition to that article, the following one was updated recently: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/articles/199563 >> ("Are we susceptible to a leap second event?") >> >> Akemi >> > This article is pretty thorough on things to consider in regards to > computers and leap seconds: > > http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1967009 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- (°- Bernard Lheureux Gestionnaire des MailingLists ML, TechML, LinuxML //\ http://www.bbsoft4.org/Mailinglists.htm ** MailTo:root at bbsoft4.org v_/_ http://www.bbsoft4.org/ <<<<<< * >>>>>> http://www.portalinux.org/