Upstream lists it here - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/s1-kickstart2-options.html So based on that, it would be assumed it would also work on CentOS. On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway at gmail.com> wrote: > Which manual? > > This could actually be the root of the issue. > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7910 > > > > On 26 May 2015 at 07:56, Jeremy Hoel <jthoel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > If the decision was made around the 4.8 time period to not fix the > problem, > > why in v6 is it still listed in the manual as being a valid option? > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway at gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > To set selinux to permissive or disabled mode during a kickstart > > > installation, add the sed -i -e 's/\(^SELINUX=\).*$/\1permissive/' > > > /etc/selinux/config command to the %post section of the kickstart file. > > > Making sure to replace "permissive" with the required selinux mode. > > > > > > > > > -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435300 > > > > > > On 26 May 2015 at 04:40, Rob Kampen <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 05/26/2015 08:32 AM, Charlie Brune wrote: > > > > > > > >> Has the "selinux --disabled" line for kickstart files been > > depreciated? > > > >> > > > >> My CentOS 6.6 kickstart file contains the line: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> selinux --disabled > > > >> > > > >> After the install completes, SELinux is enabled instead of disabled. > > > >> > > > >> I believe this has been the default since at least 6.1 - the > version > > I > > > > installed on my workstation about three years ago. > > > > It came up at first reboot with selinux enforcing. > > > > Unlike CentOS 5.x where I used selinux in permissive mode only, I > have > > > > found 6.x seems to work just fine with enforcing mode provided one > sets > > > and > > > > uses the appropriate selinux booleans that are in place for the > > packages > > > > and work scenario that one needs. As far as I recall, I have only had > > one > > > > or two situations where I've had to follow the the audittoallow > > > > instructions. > > > > > > > > /etc/selinux/config contains "SELINUX=enforcing" instead of > > > >> "SELINUX=disabled". > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >> Charlie > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> CentOS mailing list > > > >> CentOS at centos.org > > > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > CentOS mailing list > > > > CentOS at centos.org > > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > CentOS mailing list > > > CentOS at centos.org > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >