[CentOS] Openssl C6 distro tag different from upstream

Thu May 28 16:57:01 UTC 2015
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 05/28/2015 11:50 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello,
> On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 14:25 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 04/02/2015 11:45 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>>> Just noticed that the distro tag used in openssl is different from
>>> upstream. Upstream and the last update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7) use
>>> "el6_6" where as the latest update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6.8) uses
>>> "el_6". Any reason for this discrepancy?
>> could you please file this as a bug report at bugs.centos.org
> Weird, I thought I'd filed this issue and updated my account details at
> bugs.centos.org at the same time somewhere in April. (I did update the
> account details in my password manager.)  However I seem to be unable to
> find this bug report again and my account details still held the old
> values.
> Now when I try to report the issue again the summary field of the form
> provides me with the summary line that I used before, indicating that at
> least I attempted to submit this issue ;) .
> Have there been issues with bugs.centos.org (restored from backup) or
> could it be the bug report got deleted because my contact email was no
> longer valid?
> Anyway, reported the issue again at
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8801
> Beware that 1.0.1e-30.el6_6.9 < 1.0.1e-30.el6.8, so as long as the
> release number starts with 30 the tag can not be safely restored.
> Regards,
> Leonard.

Right .. once they move past -30 then we can fix it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20150528/47a9f68d/attachment-0005.sig>