[CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

m.roth at 5-cent.us

m.roth at 5-cent.us
Mon Nov 9 21:02:07 UTC 2015


Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Mon, November 9, 2015 12:42 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>>> On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>>>> I don't see the distinction you're making.
>>>>
>>>> a incremental backup copies everything since the last incremental
>>>> a differential copies everything since the last full.
>>>
>>> I guess that makes sense, but in backup systems based on rsync and hard
>>> links (such as rsnapshot), *every* backup on the backup volume is a
>>> "full" backup, so incremental and differential are the same thing.
>>>
>>>> rsync is NOT a backup system, its just a incremental file copy
<snip>
>> Actually, we use rsync for backups. We have a script that creates a new
>> daily directory... and uses hard links to previous dates. That way, it
>> looks like a full b/u... but you can go to a previous date to restore an
>> older version of the file (aka ACK! I saved that file full of garbage to
>> my Great American Novel filename! <g>).
>
> I wonder how filesystem behaves when almost every file has some 400 hard
> links to it. (thinking in terms of a year worth of daily backups).

That, I can't answer - what we have is "disaster recovery", not "archive",
so we only keep them for no more than five weeks.

On the other hand... a reasonable approach would be for, over maybe two
months old, to keep the first of the month, and rm everything else for the
month.

       mark




More information about the CentOS mailing list