[CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL
Edward Ned Harvey (centos)
centos at nedharvey.comWed Nov 11 15:17:52 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL
- Next message: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Devin Reade > > The above answer is right-on. From a technical perspective, you can > probably expect the 3rd party software to work exactly the same on > RHEL and CentOS (barring some implausible edge cases), however your > 3rd party vendor may refuse to support you at all if you're using > something that's not on their supported platforms list. Hehehe, for what it's worth, I encountered one of those edge cases a few years ago. Dell OMSA, at least in the days of Centos 4, was distributed as a self-extracting binary, that would read the contents of /etc/redhat-release and compare it against a list of predefined strings, and then refused to operate. The workaround was to hack /etc/redhat-release. But anyway. That's pretty unusual. Thanks...
- Previous message: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL
- Next message: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list