[CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces
Mark Milhollan
mlm at pixelgate.netSat Nov 14 17:06:40 UTC 2015
- Previous message: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces
- Next message: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Ulf Volmer wrote: >On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>When I enable stp: >> >> [root at localhost ~]# brctl show br0 >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 >> enp0s8 > >As Gordon said, i recommend to remove one of the physical interfaces from the >bridge. There should be no need to do that ... that is after all the purpose of STP (in effect, what STP would do is prevent one link from being used by putting it into blocking state leaving the other in forwarding state). Nominally one would prefer bonding (AKA trunking or a LAG) where both can be actively used. /mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces
- Next message: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list