[CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

Fri Nov 13 11:18:47 UTC 2015
Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com>

2015-11-12 18:17 GMT-03:00 John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>:

> On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> DEVICE=enp0s8
>> HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6
>> BOOTPROTO=none
>> ONBOOT=yes
>> NM_CONTROLLED=no
>> BRIDGE=br0
>> DEVICE=lo
>> TYPE=loopback
>> IPADDR=127.0.0.1
>> NETMASK=255.0.0.0
>> NETWORK=127.0.0.0
>> ...
>>
>
> I hope thats two seperate files, ifcfg-enp0s8 and ifcfg-lo ... otherwise,
> why is a bridged physical interface configured to be loopback?!?
>




Yes they are separate ones


>
> mine looks like...
>
>
> # cat ifcfg-br0
> DEVICE=br0
> TYPE=Bridge
> ONBOOT=yes
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
> BOOTPROTO=none
> NETWORK=....
> NETMASK=255.255.255.240
> IPADDR=.....  (its a static IP)
> GATEWAY=....
>
> # cat ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE=eth0
> HWADDR=D8:D3:85:B5:8C:6A
> TYPE=Ethernet
> ONBOOT=yes
> NM_CONTROLLED=no
> BRIDGE=br0
>
> # cat ifcfg-lo
> DEVICE=lo
> IPADDR=127.0.0.1
> NETMASK=255.0.0.0
> NETWORK=127.0.0.0
> # If you're having problems with gated making 127.0.0.0/8 a martian,
> # you can change this to something else (255.255.255.255, for example)
> BROADCAST=127.255.255.255
> ONBOOT=yes
> NAME=loopback
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
--
Sergio Belkin
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org