On 11/20/2015 09:11 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > And indeed it did. Not to the extent of going ultimately against my > scheme. OK, CentOS (7) just fell yet one more notch down in my opinion. > Thanks for correcting me. Have a look at the links I sent earlier and see if that approach might work for you. If not, I'd be interested in what needs it doesn't meet.