On 10/22/2015 1:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote: > > Im not saying that they must remove this package, but they also should > include the newer version. I use freebsd (and its not a toy distro > like fedora), and you have several ports, php, php54, php55 and php56 > to choose whatever you need. > Please, dont think that I dont appreciate the RH job on this, some one > should support a long term version, some applications needs this, but > very few. > Thats all. I needed to say this, this is the only thing that bother me > of centos, and its a little thing. The solution is to add another > repo, but is a petty that they dont include the newer version on the > default one. Centos its a great distro, dont take this a complain... > its just a suggestion. that suggestion would have to be made with RH, not CentOS, as the default CentOS package list *IS* the RHEL package list. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz