On 10/24/2015 01:59 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Sat, October 24, 2015 12:23 pm, Keith Keller wrote: >> On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>> For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark >>> specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7. >> >> For example, you could help out with Devuan, which aims to remove >> systemd from Debian, or you can switch to Slackware, one of the few >> major distros not to even include systemd (so far). > > Or switch away from Linux, say, to (Free|Opnen|Net|PC-|...)BSD just to > expand options. But to take advantage of the greatness of RHEL and CentOS > life cycle you have to live with systemd and friends no matter what you > thinks about them (you see, I already have convinced myself ;-). > > And yes, thanks for everybody's effort to keep discussion off the insanely > polarizing us topic(s). > I am quite happy even for there to be a SIG to modify CentOS-7 to not require systemd and creating a variant of that branch. Those discussions (if enough volunteers were found to staff the SIG) would take place on the CentOS-Devel mailing list. But what is of no use to anyone is another 500 mail flame thread about systemd being the devil. >> >> Johnny, thank you for your efforts in trying to keep the mailing list >> on-topic. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20151026/66bc5985/attachment-0005.sig>